Change Region:ICEJ

Headlines

Yad Vashem Chairman Urges Christian World to Keep Holocaust Remembrance Day

In his first appearance before an exclusively Christian audience as the new Chairman of Yad Vashem, Mr. Dani Dayan this week urged the Christian world to turn International Holocaust Remembrance Day every January 27th into a special day to reflect on the Holocaust, honor its victims, pray, and fight antisemitism today.

“For each decent person in the world, January 27th should not be a regular day. January 27th should be a day of reflection,… a day of prayer,… a day of meditation on how to honor the victims, how to improve combatting antisemitism, and how to strengthen the relationship with the Jewish people and the state of Israel,” said Mr. Dayan. “All the things I said are good 365 days per year, but January 27th now has a special significance. So, I call upon all our viewers, when they wake up on January 27, don’t make it a regular day. Make it a day of reflection, a day of prayer, a day of faith, a day of solidarity with the victims, with the Jewish people and with the state of Israel, and a day to combat antisemitism.”

Dayan was appearing on Tuesday (25/01) in the annual Envision leadership conference organized by the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, which this year has brought together nearly 1,000 Christian pastors and ministry leaders from more than 50 nations for a month-long online event.

In 2006, Yad Vashem entered a special partnership with the ICEJ to open a unique outreach to the Christian world by launching the “Christian Friends of Yad Vashem” initiative. As part of that cooperative effort, the ICEJ organizes an annual pastors conference during the week of January 27th which aims to better educate Christian pastors and ministry leaders on the Holocaust and the need to stand with Israel today. Because of coronavirus travel restrictions, this year’s conference is a fully online streaming event, with nearly 1,000 pastors and ministry leaders from around the world taking part.

In his live-streamed interview with ICEJ President Dr. Jürgen Bühler, Chairman Dayan added: “We extremely cherish our friendship with the Christian world, with you personally and with your Embassy. For us it is a source really of inspiration and encourages us very much knowing that we have partners in our mission.”

“I think that Yad Vashem should be open and receive with open arms every person of goodwill that wants really to come here to learn and to understand and to mourn also, and to identify with the plight of the Jewish people,” Dayan continued. “We feel without any reservation the sincerity of the feelings with which our Christian friends come here to Yad Vashem. And it's clear that in today's world, we see the Christian world as an ally and a friend. And we call upon all your audience, first and foremost, to visit Israel, when I hope that COVID will disappear soon, and to visit Jerusalem and to visit Yad Vashem. I think that for many persons, I hear it constantly, the visit to Yad Vashem has been a life-changing experience. I think it is an educational one, but no less than that it also is a spiritual one. I believe that the Hall of Names or the Righteous of the Nations path are some of the most sacred places in Jerusalem. You know that sacred places are abundant [here]. But I think those are more than sacred places of Jerusalem that every person of faith should visit.”

“I can absolutely agree to that,” responded Dr. Bühler. “The fact that I'm here now for 27 years in Israel, to a very large degree I owe to my first visit at Yad Vashem. Visiting the exhibition to see what Christians, what Germans did to the Jewish people, that really touched my heart in an incredible way.”

Dani Dayan was appointed in August 2021 as the new Chairman of Yad Vashem, the World Holocaust Remembrance Center. He previously served as Israel's Consul General in New York, as Chairman of the YESHA Council, and as Chairman and CEO of Elad Software Systems Ltd., a company he founded.

To commemorate Holocaust Remembrance Day, the Christian Embassy also held a special wreath-laying ceremony this week in the Hall of Remembrance at Yad Vashem and hosted an informative Webinar discussion with experts on fighting antisemitism and delegitimization of Israel on 27 January. View Webinar here .

Plus, we joined together with pastors and ministry leaders from around the world for dedicated prayer sessions by regions, as well as a powerful version of our weekly Global Prayer Gathering.

NB: Yad Vashem is offering the public an opportunity to partake in the IRemember Wall Campaign. This is an opportunity for the public to take an active role in Holocaust remembrance. In addition to learning about the history of the Holocaust it is crucial for people to connect with its individual victims. The IRemember Wall is a participatory program that combines both learning history and actively remembering it! Join Yad Vashem's IRemember Wall, which randomly matches people with one of the 4,800,000 names of Holocaust victims commemorated in the Central Database of Names of Holocaust Victims. Each person who joins the Wall becomes an ambassador of memory, both by joining, commemorating the victim, and sharing their story. Let's remember the Holocaust one name at a time! Go to www.yadvashem.org to join.
 

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

Bennett-Lapid coalition ‘unsettled’ on Land of Israel issues

The broad range of political parties which make up the new Israeli government also represent a wide variety of views on the Land of Israel and what areas must be either retained or ceded to ensure peace with the Palestinian Arabs. Many coalition members on the Right see continued settlement building as not only a security imperative but also a religious duty, while those on the Left insist it seriously undermines chances of reaching a two-state solution. So far, the ruling coalition has concentrated on the need to pass state budgets, but their differences over the land-for-peace question are beginning to fray at the government’s cohesion.

The new Knesset is decidedly tilted to the Right, with a strong majority of 70-plus MKs belonging to parties which place great value on holding onto as much of Eretz Israel as possible for security and religious reasons. But the current coalition is fairly balanced from Right-to-Left due to its more immediate goal of keeping former prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu out of power. Thus, those in the Bennett-Lapid government are having to live with their differences for now on land/peace issues. But it makes for an almost daily drama of internal and public quarrelling over settlement expansion.

At present, there are multiple flash points over Israeli settlement activity which are drawing the attention and ire of the international community. These include such hot spots within Jerusalem as Sheikh Jarrah, Givat Hamatos, Atarot airport, and the E-1 Corridor just east of the Mount of Olives. Meantime out in the territories, a key source of coalition tension has been the Evyatar settlement outpost, set up in response to a terror attack which killed an Israeli teen near the Tapuach junction in Samaria just weeks before the government was formed.

In June, when the coalition was still young and more harmonious, a compromise solution was brokered whereby the 50 Jewish families who had moved to the site would vacate until the legality of the new community could be decided. But as the months have passed, some Jewish settlers have returned to Evyatar and coalition members on the Left have begun showing up to protest. They even have lobbied European leaders to condemn and sanction their own government, a move which understandably has outraged coalition partners on the Right.

The internal tensions over settlement policy mounted again this week, this time involving coalition contacts with American officials. Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and the Right were none too pleased when Public Security Minister Omer Bar Lev (Labour) met with Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland and afterwards tweeted out a photo and message that he had discussed “settler violence” with the US diplomat. Ever since, Israeli media outlets have fixated on the Left/Right coalition spat over whether the Biden Administration truly is “obsessing” over the settlements issue.

Once the 2021 state budget was passed in early November, these sharp divisions within the government over the fate of the Land of Israel have come increasingly to the surface. This has forced key figures in the Center to steer a middle course intended to placate world powers while keeping the government intact.

In his role overseeing the IDF’s civilian administration in the West Bank, Defense Minister Benny Gantz has allowed new settlement housing starts to continue at almost the same pace as recent years. In addition, PM Bennett has set a goal of at least doubling the number of Israelis on the Golan and in the Jordan Valley, both of which hold unique strategic importance for Israel. But in a corresponding gesture to their left-wing colleagues, Bennett and Gantz also are permitting more homes to be built for Palestinians in Area C, as well as increasing the number of permits allowing them to work in Israel.

Nonetheless, the Left is not hiding its displeasure with its own government’s current policies. The Meretz and Ra’am parties reject all Israeli construction in Judea and Samaria, even calling it “criminal”, while the Labour party opposes any building outside the main settlement blocs.

There is a new deadline coming up in February for the 2022 state budget, and the possibility of a Netanyahu comeback is ever lurking in the background, meaning the coalition still has incentives to stay together for now. But given the Israeli government’s vastly divergent views on the land-for-peace formula, we should not expect any significant movement either for or against land concessions to the Palestinians anytime soon. What we can expect, however, is more coalition fireworks over whether the Jewish people should forge ahead with the settlement enterprise or freeze it and carve up their ancient homeland.

PHOTO: Jewish settlers pose for a group photo before voluntarily evacuating the Evyatar outpost in June (AFP).

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

The Season of Hate at the UN

This should be a joyous time of year, with Hanukkah and Christmas to celebrate and a New Year to ring in. But for Israelis, the holiday season is also a time of facing hatred and defamation at the United Nations. Before they can enjoy any festivities, the Palestinians are first empowered by the community of nations to level venomous accusations and pass odious resolutions unfairly condemning the Jewish state and people. And this ugly tradition must stop!

For decades now, the Palestinians have used the anniversary date of the UN Partition Plan, adopted on 29 November 1947, to launch several weeks of pre-programmed anti-Israel invective at the UN General Assembly. This annual hate-fest officially opens with an international day of solidarity with the Palestinian cause in the UN. That occasion is followed by the passage of a series of 15-to-20 well-worn annual resolutions vilifying Israel as well as reauthorizing the mandates and budgets of certain standing agencies within the UN Secretariat to continue spreading their anti-Israel propaganda year-round.

So just as Christmas and Hanukkah always come around this time of year, this fortnight of anti-Israel hatred has become a regular part of the UN calendar, as if it were normal and to be expected. Well, it is not! And it is time to tell our nation’s leaders and the diplomatic corps in particular that it is a mark of shame to permit this to go on any longer.

For the past 45 years, the UN has abundantly demonstrated its contempt for the Jewish state in a myriad of ways, including through these annual resolutions, which have created an internal infrastructure to perpetuate the anti-Israel atmosphere within its various organs. In 1975, the UN General Assembly passed its infamous resolution denouncing Zionism as a form of racism. But very few know that this resolution also was accompanied by the creation of two uniquely discriminatory institutions within the UN system: the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People (CEIRPP) and its staff body, the Division for Palestinian Rights (DPR).

Thankfully, the “Zionism is Racism” resolution was eventually repealed at the urging of US President George Bush just ahead of the 1991 Madrid Peace Conference. But its operational arms, the Committee and the Division defending the “inalienable” rights of the Palestinians, were never decommissioned and they have carried on with their devious work to this day. A third in-house agency, the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Human Rights Practices, had already been operating since 1968 and continues to monitor Israeli actions only and castigate it alone for human rights abuses.

This trio of agencies operate under the auspices of the UN Secretary General and are solely dedicated to propagating the worst lies against Israel. They arrange global conferences which pillory Israel and little else. They hector world leaders on behalf of the Palestinian “right of return” and other maximalist positions whose end-goal is eradicating Israel as a Jewish state. They push the skewed Palestinian narrative. And they have been a major contributor to the Israel=Apartheid and BDS campaigns of recent decades.

This means that the annual outlays of our respective nations to the UN are going to pay for Palestinian poison against the Jewish state and people, produced within the offices of the Secretariat itself. And this is all approved by esteemed diplomats on a yearly basis right before they all go off to celebrate the wonderful holiday season.

Why this disgraceful situation is so under-reported by the media is a mystery. We all saw stories this week on how a few nations did change their votes on one of these imbalanced anti-Israel resolutions – the one unjustly criticizing Israel’s record on Jerusalem which mentioned the “Haram al-Sharif” while dropping any reference to the “Temple Mount.” But it would really help to give the wider context here!

Inside the UN bureaucracy in New York are three special departments expressly created to peddle Palestinian propaganda and they are constantly working behind the scenes for passage of these “November 29 resolutions” each year. At this very same time, they also are lobbying the nations to authorize and fund their continuing operations. In the history of this world body, such an arrangement is unprecedented for inequity and malice towards a member state.

Alas, there is some good news to report. According to Gil Kapen, executive director of the American Jewish International Relations Institute (AJIRI), a think tank affiliated with B’nai B’rith International, some nations are starting to wake up to this intolerable haranguing of Israel. For several years now, the number of nations voting for the one-sided anti-Israel resolutions this time of year has been steadily declining. Several notable European nations in particular are now voting against the resolutions or at least abstaining or absenting themselves. Palestinian leaders have taken note of this and to avoid embarrassment they actually have started offering fewer or less strident resolutions. And the number of nations supporting the re-authorization and funding of the Palestinian propaganda departments within the UN system also is dropping.

Some of this shift in voting patterns has to do with the diplomatic breakthrough of the Abrahamic Accords, which have seen more and more Arab nations opting to normalize relations with Israel. Some of it is due to courageous diplomats like US Ambassador Nikki Haley, who boldly challenged the bullying of Israel by her colleagues at the UN. And some of the shift arises from the simple realization by more and more nations that these official UN departments promoting an unqualified Palestinian “right of return” are essentially working for Israel’s destruction, and thus undermining any prospects for peace.

With a little push from Israel’s many Christian friends and admirers worldwide, we could finally see an end to this sordid state of affairs by shutting down for good the Palestinian propaganda machine working inside the UN apparatus itself. It is time to tell our respective national leaders and diplomats to scrap forever the Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People, the Division for Palestinian Rights, and the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Human Rights Practices.

If Christians come together with their local Jewish communities around the globe, I believe we can send a powerful, unified message to end this charade, so that come next Christmas and Hanukkah season, our Israeli friends will not have to face this toxic annual hate-fest at the UN.

FOR MORE on this topic, make sure to watch the ICEJ weekly Webinar on “Ending the Israel Hate-Fest at the UN,” from Thursday, 9 December 2021, hosted by David Parsons and featuring Gil Kapen, Executive Director of the American Jewish International Relations Institute-B’nai B’rith International.  

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

Israel’s new Bennett-Lapid government standing test of time

Broad yet fragile, Israel’s new government has held together since taking office in June and is faring better than many expected. Forged around a rotation agreement between Prime Minister Naftali Bennett and Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, the ruling coalition consists of eight diverse Israeli parties united by their common quest to keep former premier Benjamin Netanyahu from returning to power. With so many competing agendas among its razor-thin 61 Knesset members, many wondered whether the new government could survive, much less accomplish anything. But so far, the Bennett-Lapid alignment looks to be on a stable course for the foreseeable future.

Bennett and Lapid represent a younger generation of Israeli leaders who are generally forward-looking and willing to make compromises to promote the welfare of the entire nation. They came in facing numerous challenges at home and abroad – the most immediate being the prolonged coronavirus pandemic.

As the coalition assumed office, many Israelis felt they were about to beat COVID-19 through an aggressive mass vaccination program. But then the more contagious Delta variant slipped into the country and produced a fourth wave of infections over the summer which stressed the national health system once more.

With his hi-tech background, PM Bennett listened to the medical experts, but opted to do everything possible to keep the country and economy open. Rather than strict lockdowns like under Netanyahu, he has largely relied on Israeli citizens to voluntarily follow the health rules and isolate when exposed. At the same time, the new government has continued its strict approach to foreigners entering the country, which means the tourism industry will need more time to recover.

Meanwhile, the Knesset will soon vote on passage of an annual state budget, which previous governments failed to secure over the past three years. And although it appears the budget will pass, there are numerous and often petty disputes among the coalition partners that could easily derail the process, which might trigger the dreaded prospects of yet another election. One serious dispute is over whether Palestinians can marry Israeli Arabs and gain Israeli citizenship. The Arab parties favour such a measure, but many on the right oppose it as a back-door ‘right of return.’

The proposed budget includes investments in the Arab sector to reduce the spiralling rates of inter-Arab crime and violence, and to deal with the root causes of the shocking Arab-Jewish street brawls which broke out during the Hamas rocket war last May.

On the international front, maintaining warm relations with the United States is always a top priority for any Israeli government, and PM Bennett sought to reaffirm the alliance when he flew to Washington in August for his first meeting with US President Joe Biden. The outcome was thrown in doubt, however, when Biden postponed their meeting to deal with his government’s tumultuous exit from Afghanistan. Still, Bennett received passing marks back home for his handling of the crisis moment – largely by remaining silent on the chaotic American withdrawal.

Bennett sought to focus Washington’s attention on the growing Iranian nuclear threat, while also rebuffing any push by the Biden administration for renewed peace talks with the Palestinians on a two-state solution, arguing such a move could easily fracture his coalition.

The Israeli government also is facing US pressure to curb Chinese investment in its infrastructure projects and hi-tech sector, which could give Beijing too much leverage over Israeli policies and access to sensitive Western technologies.

To deal with such issues, the Bennett-Lapid coalition is intent on rebuilding the traditional bipartisan base of support for Israel among Democrats and Republicans in Washington, which may prove tough as next year’s US midterm elections approach. The new government also wants to be proactive in repairing Israel-Diaspora relations, especially among American Jewish leaders who have felt slighted by Israel’s favouring the ultra-Orthodox over the Conservative and Reform movements. With the haredi parties out of government, Bennett and the national religious camp have a chance to bring some needed balance to certain state-synagogue issues, such as allowing civil marriages and non-Orthodox conversions, which would appease many Israelis as well as American Jews.

In addition, the battle against the BDS campaign is a key focus of the new government’s diplomatic and hasbara efforts, as seen in the on-going tussle with Ben & Jerry’s ice cream execs over their garbled and discriminatory boycott of Israeli settlements.

Above all, the Bennett-Lapid government is faced with a momentous decision on how to confront Iran as it closes in on the nuclear threshold (see Israel at a Crossroads on Iran).

Finally, keep in mind that if the opposition Likud party were to replace Netanyahu as chairman, Bennett would come under immediate pressure to renege on his rotation deal with Lapid and move to form a majority right-wing government with Likud.


PHOTO Caption and Credit:
Naftali Bennett and Yair Lapid preside over a recent meeting of the new Israeli cabinet (AP).

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

The Biden ‘two-step’ on Jerusalem

The new Israeli government’s efforts to build relations and reach a common agenda with the Biden administration got off to a rocky start when Prime Minister Naftali Bennett visited Washington in August but found US President Joe Biden too distracted by his botched Afghanistan exit to listen to Bennett’s list of concerns. Since then, Foreign Minister Yair Lapid and Defense Minister Benny Gantz have been meeting with senior US officials and some positives have started to emerge, such as reports that the Biden team is encouraging Saudi Arabia to join the Abraham Accords and normalize relations with Israel. But a lingering disagreement has arisen on the thorniest issue of all – what else but ‘Jerusalem.’

Biden wants to reopen a consulate building on Agron Street in western Jerusalem which served in the past as the chief US representative mission to the Palestinians. This unique role as an independent consulate to the Palestinian Authority in Ramallah answering directly to the State Department was ended by former US President Donald Trump in 2019 as part of his efforts to correct several anomalies in the American approach to the question of Jerusalem. The consulate’s staff was folded into the new US embassy a few blocks south in the Arnona neighborhood – a move the Palestinians viewed as part of a general downgrade of their ties with the US by Trump.

But in their recent talks in Washington, Lapid warned US Secretary of State Antony Blinken that US plans to reopen the consulate could risk toppling the fragile Bennett-Lapid government, which includes right-wing parties that may not be willing to accept such a move. Lapid reportedly contended that reopening the US consulate in Jerusalem to serve the Palestinians will encourage other nations to do the same, thus undermining Israel’s sovereignty over the city.

Blinken has responded by offering to set up (what else?) a committee to resolve the dispute. He is hopeful such a panel will allow both sides to discuss the matter discreetly and come to a mutual resolution. The move also is meant to buy time for the Bennett-Lapid government to finally pass a state budget – which Israel has been lacking over recent years due to so many repeat elections.

US officials say that reopening the consulate is part of Biden’s pledge to restore relations with the Palestinians after Trump’s cold shoulder towards them. Interestingly, they also are pointing to around ten other countries already operating consulates in Jerusalem which serve the Palestinians. Such an argument reminds us once again of the international community’s blatant hypocrisy on the issue of Jerusalem.

In December 2017, Trump made a principled and historic decision to finally give Jerusalem its due recognition as the capital of Israel, and to move the American Embassy there. This decision was backed by four decades of overwhelming bi-partisan support for such a move in the US Congress, including its landslide passage of the 1995 Jerusalem Embassy Act. It also was in keeping with the campaign promises of the three preceding US presidents, who all reneged on those promises.

Yet just days later, the United Nations General Assembly passed a resolution which demanded that the US withdraw its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and explicitly called upon all nations “to refrain from the establishment of diplomatic missions in the Holy City of Jerusalem.”

Among the nations voting for this resolution were Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, and the United Kingdom – all of which were instantly in violation of its very terms, as they each have embassies or consulates in Jerusalem which openly serve as their chief diplomatic missions to the Palestinian Authority.

It is sheer chutzpa for the Biden administration to now point to these diplomatic missions as grounds for opening up their own. If they want to send a diplomatic envoy to represent the Biden presidency to the Palestinian Authority, then they should set up shop in Ramallah – where dozens of foreign embassies and consulates are now located.

What this has exposed once more is the international community’s jaded ‘game’ on Jerusalem. For decades, they have used every excuse and pretext to deny the Jewish State and people their rightful place and claim to Jerusalem. They know Israel is legally and historically the rightful sovereign in Jerusalem, but they seek to withhold recognition of this reality in hopes of forcing Israeli concessions to the Palestinians in other areas.

The most often cited pretext in this game is that all sides should remain “even-handed” concerning the long-standing dispute over Jerusalem until its final status is determined in direct talks between Israel and the Palestinians. To that end, they insist that no country should be placing their embassy to Israel in Jerusalem.

In recent years, some of the larger European Union nations have even leaned heavily on their new member states from Eastern Europe to keep them from following Trump’s lead to open embassies in Jerusalem – lest they “prejudge” the outcome of negotiations over the city. Yet the whole time, they have had embassies and consulates to the Palestinian Authority located in Jerusalem – some even in western Jerusalem. And they routinely vote for UN General Assembly and Security Council resolutions which declare eastern Jerusalem to be “occupied Palestinian territory” – see, for example, UNSC resolution 2334. How is that even-handed?

Should the Biden administration continue this charade by reopening the Agron consulate, they will be taking us one step backwards on Jerusalem and two steps backward on peace.
 

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

Israel at a Crossroads on Iran

The Iranian nuclear threat has been building since the early 1990s, and every Israeli prime minister has had to deal with it in their own way. Over the ensuing years, each Israeli leader has expressed fealty to the ‘Begin Doctrine’ – the policy first set by Prime Minister Menachem Begin that Israel will not allow a hostile state in the region to acquire weapons of mass destruction. But it has recently emerged that due to a flurry of distractions over recent years – most notably the coronavirus pandemic and four stalemated elections – Israel may have fallen behind in its readiness to deal a lethal blow to Iran’s renegade nuclear program, if needed. Some in the security and political elite are even insisting that it may be too late for Israel to handle this threat on its own and must now rely solely on the United States to deliver the Jewish state from this dilemma. Whether that is truly the case or not, the new Bennett-Lapid government is clearly at a crossroads concerning Iran’s ambitions to destroy Israel by nuclear means.

The first Israeli intelligence reports about Tehran’s pursuit of a nuclear weapons program hit the desk of Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in 1992. The program was still very early in its development then, but it is interesting to note in retrospect that Rabin sought to sell the seven-year Oslo peace process as a race against time for the forces of peace to gain control of the region before Iran did.

Over the years, Israel has been able to slow Iran’s nuclear progress with Western help, but Tehran has been extremely determined to forge ahead. The ayatollahs learned the lessons of Israel’s attack on Iraq’s atomic reactor at Osirak under Menachem Begin in 1982 and Ehud Olmert’s surprise operation against the Syrian reactor at al-Kibar in 2007. So, they have taken key components of their nuclear infrastructure deep underground in hopes of protecting them from Israeli strikes and prying Western eyes.

Over the past decade, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu focused on securing international sanctions to impede Iran’s progress towards the Bomb, while also carrying out a series of largely successful covert operations against Iran’s nuclear facilities and atomic experts. Part of Israel’s success in getting Western powers to finally take serious action against Iran was due to the IDF showing it was indeed ready to carry out a long-range direct assault on Iran’s nuclear sites, including a very brazen war exercise involving a mass sortie of 100 strike and re-fuelling aircraft which flew all the way to Gibraltar and back in plain sight of American and European radar. The result was a tightening of sanctions on Tehran, which forced the Islamic regime to the negotiating table, but then ended in 2015 with a weak JCPOA agreement due to the Obama administration’s strangely munificent approach to Iran.

US President Donald Trump later abandoned the JCPOA, for good reasons, but the Iranians have used that as an excuse to cross a number of red lines. In recent weeks, the International Atomic Energy Agency has disclosed that Iran is enriching uranium up to 60% purity, which falls just short of weapons-grade uranium, and also has been forging uranium metal, a key part of a nuclear warhead. Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz also recently warned that Iran is only two months away from developing an atomic bomb if it decides to make one.

On the heels of that warning comes the assessment of former prime minister Ehud Barak, published in a column in Yediot Ahronot over the High Holy Days, that just as Iran is approaching the nuclear threshold, Israeli leaders have been distracted by the coronavirus crisis and two years of stalemated elections, leaving little in the budget to help the IDF keep its plans current for attacking Iran. Israel’s only option now, argued Barak, is to strengthen its ties with the US and hope it will take the actions necessary to deliver Israel from this existential threat. He added that the US does not have any military plans at present to strike Iran, and will not likely develop any under the Biden administration. The result, he concluded, is that Israelis will have to learn to live under the shadow of a nuclear Iran.

Although he criticized the Bennett-Lapid government for helping to put Israel in this dire strait, Barak put most of the blame on Netanyahu. [It is worth recalling here that Barak sat with Bibi in a coalition government not so long ago and together they developed the “gunslinger” strategy which eventually swayed the Americans and Europeans to ratchet up sanctions on Iran.]

Only time will tell if Barak’s dour assessment is right. Some suggest the Israeli military is still well-prepared for a long-range strike on Iran’s nuclear assets, especially with its new squadrons of F-35 advanced stealth fighter-bombers. Others contend that the budget shortfalls can quickly be made up and the IDF still has time to update its contingency plans for striking Iran.

In any case, there is a point in time not far ahead when Iran will likely cross the nuclear weapons threshold, closing the window for Israel to carry out pre-emptive strikes in keeping with the Begin Doctrine. Let us all pray that Israel’s leaders, intelligence agencies, military branches, and civilian resilience will all be up to the task should that moment come.

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

Yom Kippur: A Day to Prepare our Wedding Garments

“For such a High Priest was fitting for us, who is holy, harmless, undefiled, separate from sinners, and has become higher than the heavens; who does not need daily, as those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the people’s, for this He did once for all when He offered up Himself.” (Hebrews 7:26-27)

Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, is the holiest day on the Jewish calendar, and most Jews worldwide take it very seriously. It marks the day when the people of Israel are to stand before God as one and give an account for their moral lives, and then await His judgment. Recent studies show that the vast majority (85+ percent) of Israeli Jews fast on this day. The streets are empty, the TV and radio go silent. Everyone is dressed in white. It is hard to find another nation which observes such a solemn day with such respect each year.

The name Yom Kippur also means “the day of covering” – a reference to the mercy seat (kapporeth) covering the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies in the ancient Jewish temples. The High Priest had to sprinkle the blood of a sacrificial goat on this mercy seat to atone for the sins of the nation. Thus, the word kippur – which means to atone, purge or cover. It comes from the Hebrew root word kaphar, which first appears in Scripture in connection with the pitch used to seal Noah’s ark in Genesis 7. This waterproof seal saved the lives of Noah and his family. So, an atonement or covering for our sins is immensely important.

In Leviticus 23, God singles out Yom Kippur as a day when the Jewish people must “afflict your soul” (Leviticus 23:26-32). This is taken to mean that we should humble and abase ourselves, weaken our own wills, admit our wrongs, and plead for forgiveness.

Meanwhile, Leviticus 16 outlines the special duties of the High Priest at the Temple on Yom Kippur. This was the only day each year when Israel’s High Priest was allowed to enter beyond the veil into the Holy of Holies, and he was to do so twice; once for Himself and once for the people. He was first tested as to whether he or his family had sin, and if he reappeared from behind the curtain it was a good sign. This then allowed him to go back in a second time to sprinkle blood on behalf of the sins of the people. His duties included having to place incense on the “censor,” lest he die, and then sprinkle blood seven times on the mercy seat.

Why test the High Priest in this fashion? Aaron, the first High Priest, had made the Golden Calf, while his sons had offered strange fire. It was God’s mercy to allow him to be High Priest and he had to prove himself anew to be serious about his important role.

In this regard, it is interesting to note that Moses had already set the pattern for the High Priest’s duties on Yom Kippur. Moses ascended the mountain twice for 40 days each time to stand before the Lord to receive the law. The first time (Exodus 24-31), he passed the test but the people were in rebellion. In Exodus 32-34, Moses went up again to atone (intercede) for the people’s sins, and this time he stayed for 40 days once more, the people were patient, and he came down with the second set of tablets. Yet his face shone so brightly from being in the Lord’s presence that the people were afraid, so Moses put a veil over his face. Now, Jewish tradition holds that he ascended on the first day of the month of Elul and came back down with the tablets on the tenth of Tishri, which is Yom Kippur.

Yom Kippur in the New Testament
There are many references and allusions to Yom Kippur in the New Testament. For instance, in Revelation chapters 6, 8 and 11 we find imagery from the High Priest’s duties on the Day of Atonement, such as incense being placed on the censor, and the ark of the covenant being seen in the Temple above. There also are several New Testament references to the “Book of Life” – which are based on Yom Kippur traditions.

The Book of Hebrews, of course, has the most extensive treatment of Yom Kippur, which is held up as a core part of the Mosaic covenant that served as a yearly reminder of sin. But it presents the New Covenant as being built on better promises, because it was given through a better mediator. Here, Jesus is compared not only to the Aaronic priesthood, but to Moses as well as mediator of the covenant at Sinai.

Every covenant required a death, meaning some person or animal had to be sacrificed to seal the covenant. And just as the High Priests under the Mosaic law were tested on Yom Kippur, Jesus also was first tested by His suffering and death, qualifying Him to be our eternal High Priest and Lord of all (Ephesians 2:5-11; Hebrews 4:15). Indeed, he was perfected by his obedience in all the things he suffered (Luke 13:32; Hebrews 7:28). Then he reappeared – the Resurrection – because he was without sin, and thereby became the Judge of all men (Acts 2:22-33, 17:30-32). And when he sprinkled his blood on the mercy seat in heaven, he atoned forever for the sins of those who trust in his sacrifice (Hebrews 7:27).

Hebrews 5:7-11 affirms that Jesus … “in the days of His flesh, when He had offered up prayers and supplications, with vehement cries and tears to Him who was able to save Him from death, and was heard because of His godly fear, though He was a Son, yet He learned obedience by the things which He suffered. And having been perfected, He became the author of eternal salvation to all who obey Him, called by God as High Priest “according to the order of Melchizedek...”

It also is important to note here the biblical truth that the blood of Jesus speaks on our behalf in heaven, as that is where he sprinkled his blood on the mercy seat (Hebrews 9:23-24, 12:24).

Thus we can see the connection between Jesus being tested and dying at Passover and then fulfilling the further priestly role foreshadowed in Yom Kippur when he ascended to the Father and placed his blood on the ark in the heavenly temple on behalf of all who believe in him. Yet Yom Kippur has further prophetic significance, especially in connection with the Second Coming of Jesus. This also is borne out in the New Testament, as seen in the Parable of the Wedding Feast.

Parable of the Wedding Feast
The Parable of the Wedding Feast told by Jesus appears in Matthew 22:1-14 and is paralleled by the Parable of the Great Banquet in Luke 14:7-24. In Second Temple times, a wedding was a very sacred and joyous thing. The feasting and merriment even lasted for up to a week or more, and it was considered a mitzva (good deed) to share in the joy of the occasion. When Jesus told this parable, his hearers understand the picture he was creating because such traditional weddings were a part of Jewish culture.

Thus we read in Matthew 22 that a certain king arranged a marriage for his son, and invited the usual list of nobles and elite, but they all had better things to do, and some even killed the king’s servants. So, he sent out more servants to invite people from the highways and hedges – both bad and good. In Luke 14:15-24, it is described as a Great Banquet but presumably it is a wedding feast, as the preceding verses in Luke 14:7-14 have Jesus cautioning us to take the lowly seats at wedding feasts, lest you get bumped from the front row. So, these are very similar parables.

Now, Matthew says the initial invitees were too busy with their businesses and families, while Luke says the high and mighty all made excuses for why they could not attend. But
Matthew 22 has an extra scene. Right before the wedding starts, the king comes into the waiting room and inspects all the guests. One man did not have on a wedding garment. The king confronted him, but the man remained silent and offered no excuse. Then the king ordered that he be bound and thrown into outer darkness.

This moment of inspection of the wedding garments is very instructive! The Fall festivals – Rosh Hashana, Yom Kippur and Feast of Tabernacles – are all tied together and all portend the Second Coming of Jesus! They speak prophetically of the Coronation of Jesus as King and the Wedding Feast of the Lamb.

The Parable of the Wedding Feast assumes the listener is familiar with the ancient Oriental custom of the host providing garments for the guests who were invited to a royal feast. In ancient times, kings and wealthy men had wardrobes filled with fancy garments (today called ‘caftans’) as a symbol of their wealth and glory. Examples can be found as follows:

Genesis 45:22 – Joseph gives all his brother garments, but three garments to Benjamin.
Judges 14:12 – Samson offers 30 linen garments and 30 changes of clothes to answer his riddle.
2 Kings 5:22 – Naaman promises 10 garments plus gold and silver to Elisha.
2 Kings 10:22 – King Jehu gives vestments from wardrobe in the temple of Baal.
Esther 6:8 and 8:15 – Haman says: “dress him in royal robes” / Mordechai is the one dressed in royal apparel.

Even today, at very posh country clubs and restaurants, there are similar strict dress codes, and small closets with appropriate dinner jackets and other attire if an improperly dressed guest warrants entry.

In the parable of Jesus, it would have been a great insult to the king to refuse to wear the garments freely offered to the guests. The man who was caught wearing his old clothing learned what an offense it was as he was forcefully removed from the celebration.

This was Jesus’ way of teaching the inadequacy of self-righteousness. From the very beginning, God provided a “covering” for our sin. Adam and Eve tried to cover their nakedness and shame with fig leaves, but God replaced them with skins of animals, which meant a life had been sacrificed (Genesis 3:7, 21). To insist on covering our shame ourselves is to be clad in “filthy rags” (Isaiah 64:6). In the book of Revelation, we see those in heaven wearing “white robes” (Revelation 7:9), and we learn that the whiteness of the robes is due to their being washed in the blood of the Lamb (verse 14). We trust in God’s righteousness, not our own (Philippians 3:9). Further, the true Church is described as "not having spot, or wrinkle" (Ephesians 5:27).

Finally, in Revelation 19:6-9, a great multitude has gathered for the “marriage of the Lamb… and His wife has made herself ready. And to her it was granted to be arrayed in fine linen, clean and bright, for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Then he said to me, “Write: ‘Blessed are those who are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb!’’

Just as the king provided wedding garments for his guests, God provides salvation for mankind. Our wedding garment is the righteousness of Christ, and unless we have it, we will not be allowed into the Wedding Feast of His dear Son.

The great preacher Charles Spurgeon, commenting on the Parable of the Wedding Feast, duly noted that it is the custom in the East for a king to provide robes for his guests. These wedding garments were a sign of grace, freely given and received, and wearing it was a sign of respect for the king and for his son, the bridegroom. So why was the one man speechless? Making excuses is the easiest game in town. But here, there was nothing to be said. He could have easily put on a beautiful flowing robe provided by the king, but he simply did not care. And he stands as a symbol and warning to us all to take heed on how we prepare for our appearance before God.

At Rosh HaShana, the shofar sounds to awaken our souls to a time of awe and introspection, as we are about to stand before the Lord. On Yom Kippur, the verdict is delivered whether we are to be found naked and ashamed or worthy of His grace. If you pass muster, it is time to rejoice in your salvation and join the wedding feast, which is the Feast of Tabernacles!

We now find ourselves in that time of preparation before the Wedding Feast. This Yom Kippur, let us make sure we have clothed ourselves with the righteous garments God has provided through Jesus, our High Priest, and his very blood already sprinkled on the mercy seat in heaven.
 

FOR MORE on this topic, make sure to watch the ICEJ Webinar: “Yom Kippur!” from Thursday, 9 September 2021, featuring ICEJ VPs David Parsons and David van der Walt. 

 

The Tragedy of Afghanistan

The events currently unfolding in Afghanistan are an immense tragedy – and here “tragedy” is used in its most dismal, heart-breaking sense. The sudden American surrender of the country to the Taliban is not some sad or ironic ending to a Greek play. It is an unmitigated real-life catastrophe which has millions of Afghanis once again living in utter fear of the Islamist militia’s oppressive ways and imminent revenge against anyone connected to the departing US and Western forces.

It will take time to gauge just how much of a geo-strategic and humanitarian disaster the hasty American-led exit from Afghanistan is, but no doubt it will have repercussions throughout the region and beyond. The early assessment is that this is a clear win for radical Islamist and jihadist forces everywhere, most notably Iran and its proxy militias, as well as for their patrons in Russia, China and Turkey. The losers are the US, its European and NATO allies, and especially Israel and its new Sunni Arab friends.

To evaluate the fallout from the Taliban’s astonishingly rapid re-conquest of Afghanistan, we first need to look back at the country’s long descent into war and anarchy over recent decades.

The Road to Ruin
The Soviet-Afghan War, which lasted from 1979 to 1988, already had drastic effects on Afghanistan. Lasting nine years, the conflict caused the deaths of somewhere between 500,000 and two million Afghans, and displaced about six million more people, many of whom fled to Pakistan, Iran and elsewhere. Afghan society became heavily militarized and fragmented along tribal lines, as war lords of mujahideen militias competed for control of various regions of the country.

Backed by the Pakistani military and intelligence services, the Taliban militia eventually seized power in Kabul and most of the country, and they immediately began to impose a very strict version of Islamic shari’a law. They were particularly notorious for suppressing women and destroying ancient monuments. They also gave refuge to the radical Sunni terror militia al-Qaeda and its leader, Osama bin Laden, who carried out the mass terror attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001.

When the Taliban regime refused to hand over bin Laden, the US led an invasion of Afghanistan, along with British forces. By December 2001 they had quickly routed the Taliban and installed a UN-approved government under Hamid Karzai. Since then, NATO forces have helped stabilize the country and keep the Taliban in check. There has been much development and over four million Afghan refugees have returned to their homeland. But the Taliban were never completely vanquished and the prolonged battle against them has claimed some 150,000 lives over the past 20 years.

During these last two decades, the US alone has sunk an estimated $2.3 trillion into its Afghanistan mission, including more than $80 billion invested in training and equipping the Afghan army and police forces. But they were just rolled over by the Taliban after the US forces began a rapid, surprise pull-out. In just one week, the Taliban managed to take control of Kabul and most of the country, and the result is all the violence, chaos and desperation we have seen at the Kabul airport over recent days as tens of thousands try to flee in fear. Large amounts of Western military equipment have now fallen into the hands of the Taliban, and the world is facing an August 31st deadline to get people out before they face revenge from the Islamist militia.

Lessons to be Relearned
Many of the lessons to be learned from this conflict were already there from the Soviet imbroglio in Afghanistan. To start with, Afghanistan is a large mountainous region which proved to be too tough for the Russian military, and now for the US and NATO, to hold. The terrain is rough and the tribal peoples in these mountains and valleys are fiercely independent and committed to their ancient and Islamic ways.

The population of Afghanistan also is a diverse mix of ethnic tribes, including Pashtuns (42%), Tajiks (27%), Uzbeks (9%), Hazara (9%), and others. The Taliban’s support base is among the Pashtun tribes. Recent reports indicate that most of the US-trained army and police forces came from other ethnic groups, with very few Pashtuns. That, in itself, should have been a sign to US military commanders that their reliance on these forces was hugely misplaced.

Further, the US-trained Afghan security forces were happy to receive payments for their service, but they were not willing to die for their paychecks in the face of a militia committed to a radical Islamist ideology and Pashtun patriarchal dominance.

The Fallout for Israel
The implications of the Afghan tragedy for Israel could be quite serious. As we all watched desperate Afghanis clinging to planes as they lifted off from Kabul airport, the world was reminded of the chaotic American evacuation from Saigon. But the Israeli people thought back to two similar scenarios of their own in recent decades.

First, the IDF carried out a comparable overnight withdrawal from south Lebanon in May 2000, which caught its allied forces in the South Lebanese Army by surprise. The SLA soldiers were a capable and courageous fighting force, but many fled with their families over the border into northern Israel due to the shock of Israel’s unannounced exit and the threat of reprisals from the much larger Hizbullah militia. The radical Shi’ite militia has since built up a massive arsenal of over 150,000 rockets and missiles which can now threaten all of Israel.

Secondly, after Israel’s controversial Disengagement from Gaza in August 2005, the US-trained, EU-paid Palestinian Authority security forces lost control of the Strip to the Hamas terror militia in a brief but decisive skirmish in 2007. Here, the PA forces proved as well that they were not willing to die for a paycheck when confronted by militiamen driven by a mad Islamist ideology. Hamas has since developed its own homegrown rocket-making capabilities and provoked several missile wars with Israel – the latest in May of this year.

Both Hamas and Hizbullah are backed by Iran, and herein lies the real danger for Israel. The Taliban has just won a great victory in Afghanistan which no doubt is stirring and emboldening the spirit of jihad throughout the region. No one is benefitting from this more than Iran.

The Ayatollahs in Tehran now have well-armed Islamist proxy militias encircling Israel, including in Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Gaza and the Sinai. Iran also is now enriching uranium up to 60%, just one small step short of weapons-grade material, according to the IAEA. The UN’s atomic watchdog also just disclosed that Iran has begun the process of fashioning enriched uranium metal, yet another key move to developing nuclear warheads. Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz believes such moves have brought Tehran just two months away from developing the Bomb!

Given how close Iran is getting to nuclear weapons capabilities, we are now running up against Israel’s policy – or rather promise – to never allow a hostile regime in the region to acquire atomic weapons. New Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett is paying his first visit to Washington this week to meet with US President Joe Biden and try to work out an agreed approach for dealing with the Iranian nuclear threat. The meeting comes just as the Afghan fiasco has many asking whether America’s allies can trust the US any longer? The answer largely depends on who is sitting in the White House, and Biden is turning out to be a thin reed to lean upon.

The timing of a weak US administration in retreat and an aggressive and emboldened Iran pressing to cross the nuclear threshold could not be worse for Israel. And the question is whether the new, untested government in Jerusalem will take the difficult decisions necessary to finally eliminate Iran’s nuclear facilities.

In a well-timed warning, even as Biden is hosting Bennett in the Oval Office, IDF Chief of Staff Lt.-Gen. Aviv Kohavi has just stated: “The progress of the Iranian nuclear program has led the IDF to accelerate its operational plans and the recently approved defense budget is earmarked for that.” Translation: Do something about Iran or we will!
 

 

David Parsons is an author, attorney, journalist, and ordained minister who serves as Vice President and senior spokesman for the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem; www.icej.org/

Possessing the Gates of Our Enemies – Part Two

Restoring the Gates of the Church
Sadly, as in days of old, the enemy has infiltrated the gates of the Church! This is deeply worrying and so we must set out to repair these immediately. The Prophet Isaiah mirrors this truth when he writes: “Go through, go through the gates! Prepare the way for the people; build up, build up the highway! Take out the stones, left up a banner for the peoples.” (Isaiah 62:10) In the book of Nehemiah, we have a record of the gates of Jerusalem that had to be restored by the returning exiles before they could branch out and take the gates of their enemies. It is this holy work that we must urgently give ourselves over to, lest the enemy continue to impede the advancement of God’s people.

In Nehemiah chapter three, we have a record of the gates which need repair. These apply spiritually to the Church of Jesus Christ today. We should therefore note the following:

1. The Sheep Gate – Nehemiah 3, v. 1
The people of God need to be cared for and loved, and this is the calling that God places over the leaders of local churches. This must be real and engaging and not just through meeting structures. Paul was very clear about this when He called the Ephesian elders together (Acts 20:17-28).

2. The Fish Gate – v. 3
Paramount to the life and existence of the Church is the proclamation of the Gospel. This proclamation must be true and bold. When Jesus called His disciples, He told them that they will become fishers of men (Mark 1:17), and of course He re-emphasized this when He gave the Great Commission (Mark 16:15-16).

3. The Old Gate – v. 6
We must embrace “the new” that God is doing but never forget the old and tried ways of God. We are not better than previous generations and we have yet in this generation to witness a revival like that of the Wesley brothers, even though our resources and opportunities are greater. The Bible clearly warns about moving the ancient landmarks (Proverbs 22:28). So much of modern Christianity is weak and superficial because it has abandoned its fathers. This is especially true of those churches that have abandoned Israel.

4. The Valley Gate – v. 13
The Church must be separate from the world, yet sadly today there is not much difference. Our way of living is entirely different to that of the world (Acts 17:6), but in this regard the enemy has greatly infiltrated the Church. We must be in the world but not of it. Of course, this is not a popular message, but it needs to be heard and especially so because the Book of Revelation calls upon us to forsake the world system and come out of it (Revelation 18:4). James and John have very strong words to say about this matter (James 4:4-6; 1 John 2:15-17).

5. The Refuse Gate – v. 14
The people of God must grow into the likeness of Christ. Therefore, the filth (refuse) in their lives must be diminishing as they embrace the call of God over their lives and walk with Christ. Our election in Jesus, as Paul puts it, must culminate in our glorification and total transformation (Romans 8:29-30). Again, the devil has ravaged the Church in this area and so consequently preaching on holiness is regarded as negative and unedifying. The truth is, God only uses and walks among a holy people and this gate must be urgently repaired (2 Corinthians 6:15-18).

6. The Fountain Gate – v. 15
We desperately need a new outpouring of the Holy Spirit upon the people of God. This, again, is one area of biblical truth over which the powers of darkness have thrown a smokescreen, in order to prevent the Church from rising up and taking the gates of its enemies. The early Church could not go forth to take the Gates of Hell until it was filled with the Spirit and then, once placed under the fountain of God, it was unstoppable (Luke 24:46-49). The 1906 Azusa Street outpouring of the Holy Spirit actually impacted the whole world. The Wesley brothers and their associates prayed for days on end in a building on Fetter Lane in London until one day, while so doing, the power of God by the Holy Spirit fell on them, and they went out to shake the world and take the gates of their enemies.

7. The Water Gate – v. 26
Without water we cannot live, and so it is that without the flow of the Word of God we cannot live. Jesus underlined this when He said, “Man shall not live by bread alone but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.” (Matthew 4:4) Again, like never before, we are witnessing an assault against the Bible in and outside of the Church. Its inspiration and authority are being attacked and even well-known preachers are discrediting the Hebrew Scriptures or Old Testament upon which the early Church was entirely built. Topical preaching is the order of the day and expository teaching is almost wholly neglected. The result is “truth has fallen in the streets” and the people of God are generally illiterate (Isaiah 59:14). How shall we ever take the gates of our enemies if we do not know the will of God as it is expressed through His word?

8. The Horse Gate – v. 28
The horse is an animal of war. When Jesus comes again to defend Israel (Zechariah 12:8) and wage war against His enemies, He will do so on a horse (Revelation 19:11). We are called to wage war by means of intercession and the proclamation of God’s word (Ephesians 6:10-20). This is the time for the Church to go to war and thus to tear down the Gates of Hell. This war is in the nations, in order to complete the Great Commission, and in Israel, to stand with her and pray for her as Daniel did. Paul states that we have very powerful spiritual weapons, for the left and right hands, and we must urgently learn to use them (2 Corinthians 10:4-5). The ICEJ’s frequent global prayer gatherings are certainly a welcome manifestation of this battle.

9. The East Gate – v. 29
The “blessed hope” that we have is the Second Coming of Jesus (Titus 2:11-14). This is a constant reminder that as we wage war and tear down the Gates of Hell, we will conquer in the end because our great Savior will come again and, as it were, “finish the job.” He Himself said that His coming will be like lightning that flashes from the east to the west and thus we must have within our hearts the joy of looking for His soon return (Matthew 24:27). The certainty of victory embodied in His triumphant Second Coming enables us to hold the line in the battle and not give up.

10. The Inspection Gate – v. 31
There will come a day when we shall all be gathered by Christ’s coming to the glorious and perfect Kingdom of God. On that day we shall enter the Inspection Gate, where our service to God while on earth will be evaluated or inspected and we shall be rewarded accordingly (1 Corinthians 3:11-17). We will then finally enter the Gates of the New Jerusalem and subsequently we will be invited to ascend Christ’s throne. From there, and serving with Him as vice regents, we shall have dominion and authority over the created order of things (Revelation 2:26-29; Revelation 3:21-22). How astonishing, because we are just sinners saved by grace but given the privilege of taking down the Gates of Hell!

Dear friends, the time has come for us to believe and take hold of what Jesus said to His disciples. Let us restore the gates of authority in the Church and let us go forward to believe that God will from amongst us raise up men and women who will occupy crucial places of influence in the world, so that the message of the Church may prosper, and Israel may be blessed and enter the Age of Redemption. Even so, come Lord Jesus!
 

FOR MORE on this topic, make sure to watch the ICEJ Webinar: “Possessing the Gates of Our Enemies” – Part Two, from Thursday, 19 August 2021, featuring Rev. Malcolm Hedding. 

 

Possessing the Gates of Our Enemies – Part One

“And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.” (Matthew 16:18)

Gates in Scripture are places of power, authority, defense, splendor and safety. Whoever holds them or sits in them is in control of everything. Sadly, the unseen demonic world controls most of them today and they do so chiefly to resist the preaching of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. As always, however, there is a contextual element to our understanding of Scripture, and this is no less true in terms of coming to terms with the promise of God to Abraham recorded in Genesis 22:17. That is, that Israel will posses the gates of her enemies, on condition that she walks in the will and purpose of God.

Israel was called by God to be a “shining light theocracy” whereby the reality and character of God’s redeeming love for the world would be displayed through her to the nations. It is probably true that the only time when she truly possessed the “gates of her enemies” was during the reigns of David and Solomon and thereafter for short periods during the reigns of people like Hezekiah and Josiah. Nevertheless, this remarkable promise will be finally fulfilled during the glorious messianic reign of the Messiah. In that soon coming day the nations that will not honor the God of Israel by coming up annually to Jerusalem to worship Him will be judged (Zechariah 14:16ff).

The Church by its calling is not territorial. Her calling and authority is a spiritual one whereby the evil gates of spiritual dominion that block the purposes of God in revealing the light of the Gospel are torn down. Paul wrote of this struggle in this way:

“But even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, whose minds the god of this age has blinded who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God should shine on them.” (2 Corinthians 4:3-4)

“For the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but mighty in God for pulling down strongholds, casting down arguments and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, bringing every thought into captivity to the obedience of Christ.” (2 Corinthians 10:4-5)

“Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in heavenly places.” (Ephesians 6:11-12)

So then, to possess the gates of our enemies requires dedicated, importunate and energetic prayer since we are up against the unseen but real and wicked “rulers of this age.” This is no easy struggle! Christians routinely get these areas mixed up and consequently claim and assert things in prayer that are just not biblical. They sound spiritual and very triumphant, but they are just not true! We should then note the following:

1. God is already finished with the structures or systems of this world and thus our chief task is to call people out of them by the preaching of the Gospel (1 John 2:17; Revelation 18:3-5). We are not called to rehabilitate the world systems.

2. The preaching of the Gospel to every person is the sole and only purpose laid upon us by Christ Himself. We call this the Great Commission (Mark 16:15-16). Paul went to Rome, not to rehabilitate the Roman government but to preach the Gospel there (Romans 1:11-16).

3. The Church, however, is called to retard wickedness or restrain its growth by being “salt and light” in the world; salt preserves and light shines the way (Matthew 5:13). This enables the Gospel to be preached and this is the only reason why we pray for our political leaders and governments (1 Timothy 2:1-7). We want peace, not so that we can live our lives as we please, but for the easy flow and proclamation of the Gospel. In other words, we seek to possess the spiritual gates of our nations and enemies so that people can hear the saving message of Jesus. We should never forget to thank God for those places in the world where this can happen, but the powers of darkness are even now working overtime to regain these gates.

4. In certain pivotal times in history, in order to prevent the overflowing of wickedness, the Church by its devotion and prayers has greatly impacted governments and their leaders. In all cases, the onward march and proclamation of the Gospel was in the mind of God. Here are a few examples of this:

a) The spiritual conquest of Rome in the fourth century AD opened the empire to the preaching of the Gospel. Rome in fact was shortly after this destroyed by the so-called Barbarians, but the message of Jesus took root in all of Europe, North Africa, Ireland and Britain.

b) The Great Awakening in the original 13 colonies of what would become the United States of America impacted the revolutionary leaders so greatly that they were enabled by the grace of God to put in place a Constitution, which gave free course for the Gospel to be preached throughout the land without hindrance. America also became the great catalyst thereby for the proclamation of the Gospel throughout the world. This freedom is today being vigorously challenged by gates of hell!

c) The saving of the British army trapped at Dunkirk during the Second World War was achieved because of the ‘wrestling’ prayers of the Church of Jesus in the nation. Chiefly this was spearheaded by Rees Howells, the great intercessor of the time. This remarkable miracle saved Europe and no doubt the world from the wickedness and evil of Hitler’s Third Reich.

d) We could also reference people like William Wilberforce, who being an eighteenth-century Christian politician in England abolished the slave trade in the British Empire. Then there is David Livingstone, and Lord Arthur James Balfour, whose evangelical faith inspired him to make the famous declaration which paved the way for the establishment of the State of Israel, and of course Billy Graham, who routinely spoke with presidents, queens and leaders of countries.

It is to be noted that in all of these cases Christians never took over the governments of these nations, but they highly impacted them and served in them as salt and light. The lesson is clear; we possess and take hold of demonic gates for the furtherance of the saving message of Jesus Christ and not to hold physical territory. We are a spiritual body of people that is comprised of all peoples from all over the world. We are not held together by nationalism, but by Jesus Christ alone (Ephesians 2:19-22).

History has shown and proved that when Christians seek temporal power, and many are doing this today, the results have been catastrophic and the Church has suffered greatly from spiritual adultery, blindness, compromise and wickedness. This is the warning contained in Revelation 17. It is a spiritual whore that seeks temporal or territorial power!

5. What we urgently need today is the restoration of corporate prayer meetings in local churches everywhere. The early Church made corporate prayer an absolute priority and thus the pages of the Book of Acts affirm this all the time (Acts 1:14; Acts 2:1; Acts 4:24-31; Acts 13:1-2). Today, this is not so as the weekly prayer meeting, if they even have such a gathering, is the least attended meeting of the church. Jesus said that His house should in the first place be a house of prayer for all nations (Matthew 21:13). The local church today is anything but a house of prayer and this is precisely why we cannot take down the gates of hell! It has been said that the Sunday worship service demonstrates the popularity of the preacher, the Wednesday night Bible Study demonstrates the popularity of the Bible, and the Friday night prayer meeting demonstrates the popularity of God!

Dear friends, trying to take down the physical gates of this world by “claiming this” and “rebuking that” is easy and misguided, but assaulting the gates of dark demonic rulers and principalities will require wrestling prayer, dedication and effort. Somehow then, we urgently need the grace of God to bring us to this place. Peter was given the keys to the gates, that once under demonic control were torn down, enabling the Gospel to go forth from Jerusalem and to the Gentiles. We must pick up these keys again that by them we too can possess the gates of our enemies and witness the triumph of the Gospel.

 

FOR MORE on this topic, make sure to watch the ICEJ Webinar: “Possessing the Gates of Our Enemies” – Part One, from Thursday, 12 August 2021, featuring Rev. Malcolm Hedding. 

 

 

Share this: